Poland's history is deeply marked by the trauma of World War II, a period that continues to influence the nation's collective mentality and political landscape. The concept of "war trauma" is central to understanding the psychological and social dynamics in Poland today. On February 4, 2025 European Studies Centre hosted a seminar on this topic featuring Michał Bilewicz, Associate Professor of Psychology at the University of Warsaw, and was chaired by Timothy Garton Ash, Professor of European Studies at the University of Oxford. It looks into the lasting effects of this trauma, exploring how it manifests in contemporary Polish society, politics, and attitudes toward historical events.
The trauma of World War II left an indelible mark on Poland, not just in terms of physical destruction but also in the psychological scars it inflicted on the population. Stefan Baley, a psychologist, observed the profound changes in the minds of young people after the war. He described them as "suspicious, irritable, anxious, and mistrusting of institutions," with a pervasive sense of injustice. This generation, traumatised by the war, developed a mentality of breaking norms and rules, often feeling that everything was a lie. This "war complex" has been passed down through generations, influencing how Poles react to crises and perceive the world around them.
The trauma of WWII didn't end with the war; it lingered, manifesting in symptoms akin to Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). Anxiety, flashbacks, and hypervigilance became common among those who lived through the war. This trauma was also transmitted to subsequent generations, who, while not directly experiencing the war, inherited the psychological scars of their ancestors. This phenomenon, known as secondary traumatic stress, means that younger generations are more reactive to events that echo the traumas experienced by their elders.One of the most significant outcomes of this trauma is a deep-seated mistrust of institutions. Poles often see lies and conspiracies in the actions of governments and other authorities. This conspiracy mentality is not just a fringe belief but a widespread tendency to view everyday events through the lens of historical victimhood and injustice. The feeling that Poland's history has not been properly acknowledged fuels this mindset, leading to a historical narcissism—a striving for proper recognition of the nation's suffering.
Poland's history is punctuated by crises that serve as reminders of past traumas. These crises often trigger collective anxiety and reinforce the conspiracy mentality. For example, the 2010 Smolensk air disaster, which killed Poland's president and many top officials, led to widespread grief but also sparked conspiracy theories. The lack of a unified national response to the tragedy deepened the political divide in the country, particularly between supporters of the Law and Justice Party (PiS) and others. This traumatic rift in society continues to influence Polish politics and everyday life.
Similarly, the 2015 refugee crisis saw Poland react with fear and hostility toward Muslims, despite being less affected by the migration wave than other European countries. Surveys revealed a sharp increase in non-acceptance of Muslims as coworkers and neighbours, fuelled by Islamophobic rhetoric and a sense of moral panic. This reaction can be traced back to the war trauma, which has left Poles hypervigilant and mistrustful of outsiders.
In 2018, Poland’s amendment to the Act on the Institute of National Remembrance sparked international controversy. The amendment initially criminalized public statements that falsely attributed Nazi crimes to the Polish state or nation. Critics argued that it risked suppressing historical debate and reinforcing a narrative of Polish victimhood during WWII. Following the debate, Google search data showed a spike in searches for 'Polish Holocaust,' highlighting how legal and political discussions can influence public perception of history. Research also indicates that many Poles today see themselves as victims of the Holocaust, with a significant portion believing that around a quarter of the population collaborated with the Nazis. This sense of collective victimhood is linked to persistent anti-Semitic attitudes and a reluctance to fully acknowledge Polish complicity in crimes against Jews.
The COVID-19 pandemic brought another crisis to Poland, one that highlighted the enduring effects of historical trauma. While many countries saw an increase in trust in government during the pandemic, Poland's response was marked by distrust in scientific information and resistance to public health measures. This lack of trust can be traced back to the war trauma, which has left Poles sceptical of institutions and authority. Studies have shown that countries with a history of conflict and trauma, like Poland, are more likely to embrace conspiracy theories about COVID-19 and distrust science.
The trauma of WWII continues to cast a long shadow over Poland, influencing everything from political attitudes to public health responses. The transmission of trauma across generations means that even those who did not experience the war firsthand are affected by its legacy. This trauma manifests in a conspiracy mentality, a deep mistrust of institutions, and a sense of historical victimhood that shapes how Poles view themselves and the world.
To mitigate the effects of this trauma, Poland needs to address its historical narratives. International recognition of Poland's suffering during WWII is crucial, but so is a more nuanced understanding of the country's history. Education plays a key role in this process. By providing a more balanced historical narrative—one that acknowledges both the suffering of Poles and the crimes committed against Jews—Poland can begin to heal the wounds of the past.
In conclusion, Poland's WWII past is not just a chapter in history books; it is a living, breathing force that continues to shape the nation's collective mentality and politics. Understanding this trauma is essential for comprehending the challenges Poland faces today and for finding a path toward a more unified and resilient future.
No comments:
Post a Comment